NPRR209
| Title: | Data Posting Changes to Comply with P.U.C. Subst. R. 25.505 |
| Next Group: | |
| Next Step: | |
| Status: | Approved on 11/16/2010 |
| Date | Gov Body | Action Taken | Next Steps | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2010 | Board of Directors |
|
Approved | |
| 11/04/2010 | TAC |
|
Recommended for Approval | ERCOT Board for consideration. |
| 08/05/2010 | TAC | Deferred/Tabled | TAC for consideration. | |
| 07/01/2010 | TAC | Deferred/Tabled | TAC for consideration. | |
| 05/06/2010 | TAC | Deferred/Tabled | TAC for consideration. | |
| 04/22/2010 | PRS |
|
Recommended for Approval | TAC for consideration. |
| 03/25/2010 | PRS |
|
Recommended for Approval | PRS for Impact Analysis review. |
| 02/18/2010 | PRS | Deferred/Tabled | PRS for language consideration. | |
| 02/18/2010 | PRS | PRS for language consideration. | ||
| PRS for language consideration. | ||||
| Date | Gov Body | Motion | Result | Against | Abstentions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2010 | Board of Directors | To approve NPRR209 as recommended by TAC in the 11/4/10 TAC Report. | Passed | ||
| 11/04/2010 | TAC | To recommend approval of NPRR209 as amended by the 11/4/10 Luminant Energy comments and as revised by TAC. | Passed | 0 | 0 |
| 08/05/2010 | TAC | To to table NPRR209. | Passed | 0 | 0 |
| 07/01/2010 | TAC | To table NPRR209 for one month. | Passed | 0 | 1 Independent Power Marketers |
| 05/06/2010 | TAC | To table NPRR209. | Passed | 0 | 0 |
| 04/22/2010 | PRS | To endorse and forward the 3/25/10 PRS Report and Impact Analysis for NPRR209 to TAC. | Passed | 5 (2 - Cooperative; 2 - MOU; 1 - IOU) | 1 MOU |
| 03/25/2010 | PRS | To recommend approval of NPRR209 as submitted. | Passed | 3 - 1 Cooperative, 1 Municipal and I Investor Owned Utility | 5 - 2 Municipals, 2 Consumers and 1 Independent Retail Electric Provider |
| 02/18/2010 | PRS | To table NPRR209. | Passed | 0 | 2 Coop, IOU |
| 02/18/2010 | PRS | To recommend approval of NPRR209 as submitted. | Failed |
Vote tallies here reflect individual votes, not the weight of the votes by market segment. Affirmative votes are not recorded in these vote tallies. For additional details on the voting record, please consult the Recommendation or Action Report, or the official vote tally if available, as posted in the key documents.
| Status: | Approved |
| Date Posted: | 02/05/2010 |
| Sponsor: | Adrian Pieniazek, NRG Texas and Randy Jones, Calpine |
| Urgent: | No |
| Sections: | 1.3.1.1, 6.5.7.1.13 |
| Description: | This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) removes a requirement to post certain State Estimator information that can be used to determine Resource status, which is confidential information as per Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) rules. |
| Reason: |
State Estimator data includes transmission and transformer flow information as identified in paragraphs (4)(b) and (4)(d) of Section 6.5.7.1.13, Data Inputs and Outputs for the Real-Time Sequence and SCED. Because transmission and transformer flow data at generation-only busses reflects generation output, disclosure of this information would make it possible to determine Resource status information in Real-Time. Resource status information has consistently been considered competitively sensitive information in the competitive market and cannot be posted until 60 days after the operating day. See subsection (f)(3)(B)(iii) of P.U.C. Subst. R. 25.505, Resource Adequacy in the Electric Reliability Council fo Texas Power Region. During the initial phases of Nodal Market testing, NRG Texas noticed that the posting of certain transmission information every hour, as required by Protocol Sections 6.5.7.1.13(4)(b) and (d), allows Market Participants to determine the actual output of Resources on the system. NRG Texas and Calpine filed comments and a proposed amendment to address this issue via NPRR 202, Clarification of Network Operations Model and State Estimator Postings, which restricted other information in the network model from being publicly posted. The proposed amendment was rejected, due in part to concerns that attempting to modify NPRR202 could hold up that NPRR’s implementation. Because NRG Texas and Calpine agree that the majority of NPRR202 is acceptable and neither entity wishes to hold up progress on NPRR202, they chose not to appeal the rejection of the proposed amendment. Instead, this new NPRR addresses the specific issues that are of concern to NRG Texas and Calpine. PUCT Subst. R. 25.505(f)(3)(B) states: “Two months after the start of operation of the market under a nodal market design:
|
-
(02/05/10, .doc, 109 KB)
-
(02/05/10, .doc, 72.5 KB)
-
(02/15/10, .doc, 49.5 KB)
-
(02/19/10, .doc, 117.5 KB)
-
(02/19/10, .xls, 93.5 KB)
-
(03/25/10, .doc, 40 KB)
-
(03/26/10, .doc, 102 KB)
-
(03/26/10, .xls, 93.5 KB)
-
(04/14/10, .doc, 46 KB)
-
(04/21/10, .doc, 67 KB)
-
(04/21/10, .doc, 42 KB)
-
(04/27/10, .doc, 107 KB)
-
(04/27/10, .xls, 120.5 KB)
-
(05/04/10, .doc, 66.5 KB)
-
(05/07/10, .doc, 111 KB)
-
(05/07/10, .xls, 137.5 KB)
-
(07/06/10, .doc, 115.5 KB)
-
(07/06/10, .xls, 103 KB)
-
(07/06/10, .xls, 125 KB)
-
(08/05/10, .doc, 116.5 KB)
-
(10/28/10, .doc, 66 KB)
-
(10/28/10, .doc, 46.5 KB)
-
(11/03/10, .doc, 69 KB)
-
(11/04/10, .doc, 66 KB)
-
(11/05/10, .doc, 126.5 KB)
-
(11/12/10, .doc, 82 KB)
-
(11/16/10, .doc, 127.5 KB)